0
selected
-
1.
A multidomain intervention against cognitive decline in an at-risk-population in Germany: Results from the cluster-randomized AgeWell.de trial.
Zülke, AE, Pabst, A, Luppa, M, Roehr, S, Seidling, H, Oey, A, Cardona, MI, Blotenberg, I, Bauer, A, Weise, S, et al
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2024;20(1):615-628
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Due to ageing populations, there is a rapid increase in people living with dementia. A number of modifiable risk factors have been identified, including obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, depression, physical inactivity, smoking and social isolation. The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial, including 1030 participants at risk of developing dementia aged 60-77, was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention which included optimisation of nutrition and medication, and physical, social, and cognitive activity for two years compared to standard care. There was no benefit of the intervention for the primary outcome global cognitive performance. The intervention had a positive effect on the secondary outcome health-related quality of life but did not have any significant effect on quality of life, depressive symptoms, social inclusion, activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. The study period coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Significantly more participants than controls reported perceived COVID-19-related restrictions with regards to nutrition, whilst there was no such differences between groups for physical, cognitive or social activity. Better adherence to the nutrition and social activity components of the programme were associated with better global cognitive performance, whilst there was no association with physical and cognitive activity.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Nutrition counselling based on the guidelines of the German Society for Nutrition, in association with other lifestyle counselling and optimisation of medication, does not improve GCP.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the AgeWell.de programme which targets modifiable risk factors for dementia.
Methods
- Cluster-randomised, controlled trial (clustered by participating general practitioners).
- Intervention: nutritional counselling (based on the guidelines by the German Society for Nutrition), enhancement of physical and social activity, cognitive training, and the management of cardiovascular risk factors (overweight, smoking). Baseline individual face-to-face session with study nurse, followed by contact with the nurse after 2, 4 and 8 months, second face-to-face session with the nurse at 12 months and further contacts at 16 and 20 months. Endpoint assessments at 24 months.
- Controls: standard care.
- Sample size: 1030 adults aged 60-77 at increased risk of dementia, of which 819 completed the study and were included in the analysis.
- Primary outcome: global cognitive performance (GCP)
- Secondary outcomes: mortality, nursing home placement, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), quality of life (QOL), health-related (QOL), depressive symptoms, and social inclusion.
Results
- No significant difference in GCP, p=0.874. No difference in ADL (p=0.374), IADL (p=0.746), QOL (p=0.964), depressive symptoms (p=0.090) and social inclusion (p=0.495).
- Improvement in health-related QOL (AME = 0.198, 95% CI: 0.069, 0.328, p=0.003).
- Results for mortality and nursing home placement are not reported.
- Part of the study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. More participants (9%) than controls (3.7%) reported perceived COVID-19-related restrictions with regards to nutrition (p=0.004). No such difference was observed for perceived restrictions regarding physical activity (p=0.328), cognitive activity (p=0.262) or social activity (p=0.192).
Conclusion
- The authors concluded that the multidomain intervention had no beneficial effects on GCP and that higher-intensity interventions and more ambitious goals may be needed.
Clinical practice applications:
- Nutrition counselling based on the guidelines of the German Society for Nutrition, in association with other lifestyle counselling and optimisation of medication, does not improve GCP.
Considerations for future research:
- Studies using more intensive and individualised interventions may evaluate whether such strategies are more beneficial for improving GCP.
- Studies of specific subgroups, e.g. based on lifestyle or medical risk factors, may help find more specific populations and interventions to help improve GCP.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention to preserve cognitive function in older adults at risk for dementia in Germany in a cluster-randomized trial. METHODS Individuals with a Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score ≥ 9 aged 60 to 77 years were recruited. After randomization of their general practitioner (GP), patients received a multidomain intervention (including optimization of nutrition and medication, and physical, social, and cognitive activity) or general health advice and GP treatment as usual over 24 months. Primary outcome was global cognitive performance (composite z score, based on domain-specific neuropsychological tests). RESULTS Of 1030 participants at baseline, n = 819 completed the 24-month follow-up assessment. No differences regarding global cognitive performance (average marginal effect = 0.010, 95% confidence interval: -0.113, 0.133) were found between groups at follow-up. Perceived restrictions in intervention conduct by the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact intervention effectiveness. DISCUSSION The intervention did not improve global cognitive performance. HIGHLIGHTS Overall, no intervention effects on global cognitive performance were detected. The multidomain intervention improved health-related quality of life in the total sample. In women, the multidomain intervention reduced depressive symptoms. The intervention was completed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
2.
Effects of an educational intervention on frailty status, physical function, physical activity, sleep patterns, and nutritional status of older adults with frailty or pre-frailty: the FRAGSALUD study.
Casals, C, Ávila-Cabeza-de-Vaca, L, González-Mariscal, A, Marín-Galindo, A, Costilla, M, Ponce-Gonzalez, JG, Vázquez-Sánchez, MÁ, Corral-Pérez, J
Frontiers in public health. 2023;11:1267666
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Frailty and pre-frailty are associated with an increased risk of premature mortality. Factors involved in the development of frailty include physical activity, sleep and nutrition. The aim of this 6-month randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of an educational programme on frailty, physical function, physical activity, sleep and nutritional status. 166 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or over with frailty or pre-frailty were randomised to either receive a health education programme consisting of 4 group sessions in the first month which included guidelines for physical activity, nutrition and cognitive training as well as the promotion of psychological and social wellbeing and 6 follow-up calls over 6 months or their usual healthcare (control). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had significant reductions in frailty score, exhaustion and fatigue score, increase in gait speed and improvements in various physical function tests. The intervention group also showed significant improvements in mini nutritional assessment compared to the control group although this was not associated with significant changes in anthropometric parameters. There was a significant increase in awakenings in the control group whilst this parameter did not change in the intervention group, whilst there were no changes in other sleep parameters. The authors concluded that the simplicity, affordability and effectiveness of the health education programme may contribute to healthy ageing.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
To improve frailty and physical functioning, a comprehensive programme may be effective, which includes:
- Nutrition
- Physical exercise
- Cognitive training
- Promotion of social and psychological wellbeing.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Frailty and pre-frailty increase the risk of premature mortality but are reversible
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a health education programme on frailty status in frail or pre-frail older persons.
Methods
- Randomised controlled trial
- Participants: 166 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or over with frailty or pre-frailty living in Spain were enrolled, 163 completed the study (80 in intervention and 83 in control group)
- Four weekly group sessions which included guidelines for physical activity, nutrition and cognitive training as well as the promotion of psychological and social wellbeing and 6 follow-up calls over 6 months versus usual healthcare (control).
Results
- Baseline demographics: The educational group consisted of more women (p=0.001), had a younger average age (p=0.019), lower height (p=0.001) and a higher average education level (p=0.013) compared to the control group.
Effects on intervention group:
- Reductions in frailty score (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group), with 30% of participants in the intervention group no longer being classified as frail or pre-frail in contrast to none in the control group
- Reductions in fatigue and exhaustion score (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Increase in gait speed and improvements in various physical function tests (all p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Improvements in mini nutritional assessment (p<0.001 vs baseline and change vs change in control group)
- Improvement in sleep behaviour demonstrated by an increase in awakenings in the control group (p<0.05 vs baseline and change vs change in intervention group) whilst this parameter did not change in the intervention group.
No effects (vs control) on:
- Anthropometric parameters/unintended weight loss
- Other sleep parameters
- Physical activity expenditure and physical activity score
- Hand grip strength.
Conclusion
This affordable and simple health education programme is effective in reducing frailty in elderly and may contribute to healthy ageing.
Clinical practice applications:
- A comprehensive programme, encompassing not only nutrition, but also exercise, cognitive training and a focus on social and psychological wellbeing may be most effective in improving frailty and physical functioning
- Nutrition intervention, alongside other lifestyle interventions, may have benefits for nutritional status in older adults, even if this is not reflected in a change in anthropometric parameters, such as weight.
Considerations for future research:
- Studies with longer-term follow-up would help evaluate whether/for how long the benefits are sustained.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of frailty is increasing worldwide, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing healthy ageing. To address this, cost-effective and minimally supervised interventions are being sought. This study aimed to assess the impact of an educational program on frailty status, physical function, physical activity, sleep patterns, and nutritional status in community-dwelling older adults with at least 1 Fried's frailty criteria. METHODS A 6-month multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023 in 14 health centres located in Cadiz and Malaga, Spain. The educational intervention consisted of 4 group sessions and 6 follow-up phone calls spread over 6 months. The program focused on educating participants about frailty and its impact on health, providing guidelines for physical activity, healthy dietary habits, cognitive training, psychological well-being and social activities. A total of 163 participants, divided into control (n = 80) and educational groups (n = 83) were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS The results showed a significant group-time interaction in the physical function evaluated with a large effect on Short Physical Performance Battery score (η2p = 0.179, -0.1 [-1.2-1.0] points for control group vs. 1.0 [0.0-3.0] points for educational group, p < 0.001), and an effect on the 4-meter gait test ((η2p = 0.122, 0.5 [0.1-0.0] s for control group vs. -0.4 [-0.5- -0.3] s for educational group, p < 0.001), and the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (η2p = 0.136, 1.0 [0.0-1.2] s for control group vs. -4.3 [-7.0- -2.3] for educational group, p < 0.001). Additionally, the use of accelerometers to assess physical activity, inactivity, and sleep patterns revealed a significant small effect in the number of awakenings at night ((η2p = 0.040, 1.1 [-0.5-3.4] awakenings for control group vs. 0.0 [-2.2-0.0] awakenings for educational group, p = 0.009). The findings also highlighted a significant medium effect regarding malnutrition risk, which was assessed using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment score (η2p = 0.088, -0.7 [-2.3-1.5] points for control group vs. 1.5 [-0.5-3.0] points for educational group, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Thus, the 6-month educational program effectively improved physical function, sleep patterns, and nutritional status compared to usual healthcare attendance in community-dwelling older adults with frailty or pre-frailty. These findings underscore the potential of minimally supervised interventions in promoting a healthy lifestyle in this vulnerable population.
-
3.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 decreases subjective academic stress in healthy adults: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Wauters, L, Van Oudenhove, L, Accarie, A, Geboers, K, Geysen, H, Toth, J, Luypaerts, A, Verbeke, K, Smokvina, T, Raes, J, et al
Gut microbes. 2022;14(1):2031695
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous research has shown a bidirectional relationship between the gut and psychological stress, which could be mediated by intestinal permeability followed by an immune and inflammatory response. However, the exact mechanisms of this relationship are yet to be elucidated. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress markers during a public speech in healthy students. Participants consumed either milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 or acidified milk twice daily for four weeks to assess subjective and objective stress markers and markers of intestinal permeability. Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 reduced the stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol and subjective stress markers (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/ STAI). A subgroup of healthy students with stress-induced cortisol >P90 of baseline showed a reduction in perceived stress score following Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 intervention. To evaluate the additional effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on stress and gut health, further robust studies are needed. Healthcare professionals can use the findings of this study to understand the anxiolytic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690.
Abstract
Psychological stress negatively affects the intestinal barrier function in animals and humans. We aimed to study the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress-markers during public speech. Healthy students were randomized to L. rhamnosus-containing (test) or acidified (placebo) milk consumed twice daily for 4 weeks, with 46 subjects per treatment group. Small intestinal permeability was quantified by a 2 h urinary lactulose-mannitol ratio (LMR, primary outcome), fractional excretion of lactulose (FEL) and mannitol (FEM). Salivary cortisol, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress scores (PSS) were collected. No between-treatment differences were found for LMR (p = .71), FEL or FEM. Within-treatment analyses showed similar LMR and FEL but a stress-induced increase of FEM with the placebo (p < .05) but not test product. Despite a similar increase in salivary cortisol, the stress-induced increase in STAI was significantly lower with the test product vs. placebo (p = .01). Moreover, a stress-preventative effect of the probiotic was found for PSS and more pronounced in subjects with high stress-induced cortisol (p = .01). While increased FEM was mediated by salivary cortisol levels, the effect of the test product on subjective stress was not mediated by changes in FEM. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, we demonstrated that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 prevented stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol. Subjective but not objective stress-markers were reduced with L. rhamnosus vs. placebo, suggesting anxiolytic effects, which were independent of barrier stabilization and attractive for the reduction of stress in both health and disease. Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03408691.
-
4.
Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention in Primary Care That Addresses Patients with Diabetes Mellitus with Two or More Unhealthy Habits, Such as Diet, Physical Activity or Smoking: Multicenter Randomized Cluster Trial (EIRA Study).
Represas-Carrera, F, Couso-Viana, S, Méndez-López, F, Masluk, B, Magallón-Botaya, R, Recio-Rodríguez, JI, Pombo, H, Leiva-Rus, A, Gil-Girbau, M, Motrico, E, et al
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Life habits such as smoking, physical activity, and diet affect glycaemic control. The objective of this multicentre randomised cluster trial (EIRA study) was to evaluate the effectiveness of multicomponent educational interventions on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients. Interventions in multicomponent individual, group and community settings included smoking cessation, the Mediterranean diet and physical activity, as well as an assessment of the quality of life. Participants had unhealthy lifestyles prior to the intervention. The study was conducted in 26 primary healthcare centres in seven health departments in Spain over a period of 12 months. A brief intervention aimed to change the habits of the participants, including increasing physical activity, quitting smoking and adhering to the Mediterranean diet. After 12 months of intervention, there were no statistically significant improvements in glycaemic control, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, or quality of life. However, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was statistically significant. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in improving glycaemic control. The clinical applicability of multicomponent interventions to tackle type 2 diabetes, obesity, and unhealthy lifestyles should be considered by healthcare providers.
Abstract
Introduction: We evaluated the effectiveness of an individual, group and community intervention to improve the glycemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45-75 years with two or three unhealthy life habits. As secondary endpoints, we evaluated the inverventions' effectiveness on adhering to Mediterranean diet, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and quality of life. Method: A randomized clinical cluster (health centers) trial with two parallel groups in Spain from January 2016 to December 2019 was used. Patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45-75 years with two unhealthy life habits or more (smoking, not adhering to Mediterranean diet or little physical activity) participated. Centers were randomly assigned. The sample size was estimated to be 420 people for the main outcome variable. Educational intervention was done to improve adherence to Mediterranean diet, physical activity and smoking cessation by individual, group and community interventions for 12 months. Controls received the usual health care. The outcome variables were: HbA1c (main), the Mediterranean diet adherence score (MEDAS), the international diet quality index (DQI-I), the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), sedentary lifestyle, smoking ≥1 cigarette/day and the EuroQuol questionnaire (EVA-EuroQol5D5L). Results: In total, 13 control centers (n = 356) and 12 intervention centers (n = 338) were included with similar baseline conditions. An analysis for intention-to-treat was done by applying multilevel mixed models fitted by basal values and the health center: the HbA1c adjusted mean difference = -0.09 (95% CI: -0.29-0.10), the DQI-I adjusted mean difference = 0.25 (95% CI: -0.32-0.82), the MEDAS adjusted mean difference = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.01-0.89), moderate/high physical activity OR = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.64-1.86), not living a sedentary lifestyle OR = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.55-1.73), no smoking OR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.54-1.06), EVA adjusted mean difference = -1.26 (95% CI: -4.98-2.45). Conclusions: No statistically significant changes were found for either glycemic control or physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and quality of life. The multicomponent individual, group and community interventions only showed a statistically significant improvement in adhering to Mediterranean diet. Such innovative interventions need further research to demonstrate their effectiveness in patients with poor glycemic control.
-
5.
PROFAST: A Randomized Trial Assessing the Effects of Intermittent Fasting and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Probiotic among People with Prediabetes.
Tay, A, Pringle, H, Penning, E, Plank, LD, Murphy, R
Nutrients. 2020;12(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of diabetes is increasing worldwide, and with it, the risk of cardiovascular disease is also increasing. Intermittent fasting has been shown to reduce weight and improve glycaemic control. Weight control and glycaemic control were also improved with probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 supplementation. This pilot, 12-week, double-blinded, two-armed, randomized 1:1 study aimed to investigate the combined effects of intermittent fasting with daily probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 supplementation on glycaemic management in participants with prediabetes. For two days, participants restricted their calorie intake to 600-650 kcal, followed by five days of ad libitum consumption (5:2). Intermittent fasting for 12 weeks improved glycaemic control (reduced HbA1c) and reduced body weight by 5%. The supplementation with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 did not significantly improve these outcomes. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved mental health and social functioning in participants. There is a need for further large, robust studies to assess the effects of intermittent fasting alone and when it is combined with different exercise forms and different prebiotic and probiotic supplements on cardiometabolic markers and mental health. The findings of this study may be useful to healthcare professionals in understanding the effects of fasting on metabolism as well as the psychological benefits of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 supplementation.
Abstract
Both intermittent fasting and specific probiotics have shown promise in improving glucose tolerance with a potential for synergistic effects through alterations to gut microbiota. In this randomized, double-blinded, two-arm feasibility study, we investigated whether intermittent fasting, supplemented with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, reduces HbA1c in individuals with prediabetes. All participants with HbA1c 40-50 mmol/mol commenced intermittent fasting (2 days per week of calorie restriction to 600-650 kcal/day) and were randomized 1:1 to either daily probiotic (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included changes in anthropometry, body composition, glucoregulatory markers, lipids, hunger hormones, liver enzymes, inflammatory markers, gut hormones, calorie and macronutrient intake, quality of life, hunger, mood and eating behavior. Of 33 participants who commenced the trial, 26 participants (mean age 52 years, body mass index (BMI) 34.7 kg/m2) completed the intervention (n = 11 placebo, n = 15 probiotic). HbA1c decreased from 43 ± 2.7 mmol/mol to 41 ± 2.3 mmol/mol, p < 0.001, with average of 5% weight loss. No significant between-group differences were seen in primary or secondary outcomes except for social functioning (p = 0.050) and mental health (p = 0.007) scores as improvements were seen in the probiotic group, but not in the placebo group. This study shows additional psychological benefits of probiotic supplementation during intermittent fasting to achieve weight loss and glycemic improvement in prediabetes.